The European Union and NATO have chosen to remain silent concerning Greenland following Denmark’s appeal for its allies to avoid commenting on Donald Trump’s threats regarding the Arctic territory. This strategy, coordinated closely with NATO and the EU, indicates the challenges faced by US allies in managing Trump’s confrontational diplomatic style.
Last week, Trump engaged in a heated 45-minute phone call with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, prompting Danish officials to enter “crisis mode.” During the call, Trump threatened to impose tariffs on Denmark and did not dismiss the possibility of seizing Greenland by force. Over the weekend, he reiterated his determination to acquire Greenland—a self-governing region within the Kingdom of Denmark—while ridiculing the Danish defense efforts, like “dog sleighs,” in the area, which is home to a substantial US military presence.
The US has a mutual defense agreement with Denmark through NATO, and the EU’s governing treaty also contains provisions for mutual defense. Initially, Danish and European officials speculated that Trump’s remarks about Greenland might be a negotiation tactic to enhance US influence in a region increasingly contested by Russia and China. However, in light of recent developments, officials recognize the situation warrants serious consideration due to its potential global ramifications.
Despite the gravity of the situation, Danish, EU, and NATO officials have opted to keep public discussions to a minimum, as they believe that a direct challenge to Trump may only worsen the crisis. A senior European official remarked that maintaining a low profile may be the best approach, hoping Trump becomes distracted by other matters. Another official from the EU expressed that a retaliatory strategy would not be beneficial but affirmed their commitment to principles like national sovereignty.
Frederiksen met with the leaders of Norway and Sweden, along with Finland’s president, to discuss the situation regarding Greenland, but no public declarations were made post-meeting, and there has been no coordinated NATO or EU response in defense of Denmark or Greenland.
When questioned about Trump’s comments regarding Greenland, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte indicated the need for dialogue with Trump, affirming that the focus should remain on ensuring Arctic security. Neither the head of the European Commission nor the president of the European Council has publicly addressed Trump’s threats.
EU chief diplomat Kaja Kallas stated that the EU is not negotiating Greenland but is supporting Denmark and is focused on a European perspective rather than reacting to US actions. Meanwhile, discussions are ongoing among senior officials in Brussels, Copenhagen, and Nuuk regarding the potential for strengthened collaboration with Greenland in sectors like raw materials extraction and energy.
One official noted significant behind-the-scenes efforts are underway to enhance cooperation with Greenland, while being cautious not to appear as if the EU is responding exclusively due to Trump’s recent actions. Rasmus Jarlov, a former Danish minister and current opposition MP, endorsed Frederiksen’s government approach of firm yet courteous communication with the US, suggesting that it would be prudent for Europe to unite should the situation escalate.
Concerns remain among officials about Europe’s capacity to effectively respond should Trump act on his Greenland threats, with one official acknowledging the absence of a comprehensive alternative strategy at this time.
photo credit: www.ft.com
